MEADOR v. WEDELL, CIV S-10-0901 KJM DAD P. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20120406954
Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 05, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 05, 2012
Summary: ORDER DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge. On March 29, 2012, plaintiff filed an untimely declaration in support of his February 17, 2012 objections to the findings and recommendations issued on February 2, 2012, a motion for a preliminary injunction to obtain legal supplies and seeking the imposition of monetary sanctions on the prison law librarian, and a reply to defendants' opposition to plaintiff's March 27, 2012 request for a 120-day extension of time in which to exhaust his administrative r
Summary: ORDER DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge. On March 29, 2012, plaintiff filed an untimely declaration in support of his February 17, 2012 objections to the findings and recommendations issued on February 2, 2012, a motion for a preliminary injunction to obtain legal supplies and seeking the imposition of monetary sanctions on the prison law librarian, and a reply to defendants' opposition to plaintiff's March 27, 2012 request for a 120-day extension of time in which to exhaust his administrative re..
More
ORDER
DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.
On March 29, 2012, plaintiff filed an untimely declaration in support of his February 17, 2012 objections to the findings and recommendations issued on February 2, 2012, a motion for a preliminary injunction to obtain legal supplies and seeking the imposition of monetary sanctions on the prison law librarian, and a reply to defendants' opposition to plaintiff's March 27, 2012 request for a 120-day extension of time in which to exhaust his administrative remedies. (Docs. No. 83, 84, & 86.)
The undersigned's findings and recommendations recommending dismissal of this action due to plaintiff's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit were adopted by the assigned District Judge and this civil rights action was closed on March 28, 2012. Plaintiff is advised that documents filed by plaintiff since the closing date will be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to future filings.
Source: Leagle
