U.S. v. KUZMENKO, 2:11-CR-00210 JAM. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160107b42
Visitors: 11
Filed: Dec. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 04, 2015
Summary: RESPONSE TO JURY NOTE #2 JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . The indictment alleges that the 38 transactions in this case are part of an overall scheme to defraud. An indictment is not evidence. You must determine as to each count whether the transaction involved is part of one overall scheme, several individual schemes, or no scheme at all.
RESPONSE TO JURY NOTE #2
JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
The indictment alleges that the 38 transactions in this case are part of an overall scheme to defraud. An indictment is not evidence. You must determine as to each count whether the transaction involved is part of one overall scheme, several individual schemes, or no scheme at all.
Source: Leagle
