ATCHLEY v. FOX, CV 13-9268-MWF (JPR). (2016)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20160509475
Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 26, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 26, 2016
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge. On February 17, 2016. Petitioner filed objections to the R&R, in which he mostly simply repeats the arguments in his Petition, including asking the Court to reweigh the evidence presented at trial. His arguments were thoroughly addressed and rejected in the R&R. Having mad
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge. On February 17, 2016. Petitioner filed objections to the R&R, in which he mostly simply repeats the arguments in his Petition, including asking the Court to reweigh the evidence presented at trial. His arguments were thoroughly addressed and rejected in the R&R. Having made..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge. On February 17, 2016. Petitioner filed objections to the R&R, in which he mostly simply repeats the arguments in his Petition, including asking the Court to reweigh the evidence presented at trial. His arguments were thoroughly addressed and rejected in the R&R.
Having made a de novo determination of those portions of the R&R to which Petitioner has filed objections, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge in the R&R as well as in her June 20 and November 19, 2014 orders.
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
