McDermott v. Soto, CV 16-1888-GW (AGR). (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180918962
Visitors: 9
Filed: Sep. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 17, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and the Objections. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Jud
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and the Objections. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judg..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
GEORGE H. WU, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and the Objections. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that judgment be entered dismissing the Petition as second or successive pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2).
Source: Leagle
