PHONEDOG, LLC v. KRAVITZ, 3:11-cv-03474-MEJ. (2013)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20130308839
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jan. 08, 2013
Latest Update: Jan. 08, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AFTER SETTLEMENT MARIA-ELENA JAMES, District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Counterdefendant PhoneDog, LLC and Defendant and Counterclaimant Noah Kravitz, as follows: 1. The parties agree that this action shall be dismissed with prejudice. 2. The settlement reached by the parties shall remain in effect and shall not be vocated. 3. The parties agree that the court shall, notwithstanding dismissal of the action, retain jurisdiction of enf
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AFTER SETTLEMENT MARIA-ELENA JAMES, District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Counterdefendant PhoneDog, LLC and Defendant and Counterclaimant Noah Kravitz, as follows: 1. The parties agree that this action shall be dismissed with prejudice. 2. The settlement reached by the parties shall remain in effect and shall not be vocated. 3. The parties agree that the court shall, notwithstanding dismissal of the action, retain jurisdiction of enfo..
More
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AFTER SETTLEMENT
MARIA-ELENA JAMES, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Counterdefendant PhoneDog, LLC and Defendant and Counterclaimant Noah Kravitz, as follows:
1. The parties agree that this action shall be dismissed with prejudice.
2. The settlement reached by the parties shall remain in effect and shall not be vocated.
3. The parties agree that the court shall, notwithstanding dismissal of the action, retain jurisdiction of enforcing the settlement agreement.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
