STRIBLING v. BORTOLEMEDI, 2:10-cv-3247-KJM CKD P. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20120621886
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jun. 20, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 20, 2012
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge. Defendant BORTOLEMEDI seeks an order from the Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(4), to permit defendant's counsel to conduct the deposition of plaintiff AARON STRIBLING via videoconference. Having read defense counsel's request, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendant's request to conduct plaintiff's deposition via videoconference is GRANTED. 2. Nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as requiring any penal institution t
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge. Defendant BORTOLEMEDI seeks an order from the Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(4), to permit defendant's counsel to conduct the deposition of plaintiff AARON STRIBLING via videoconference. Having read defense counsel's request, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendant's request to conduct plaintiff's deposition via videoconference is GRANTED. 2. Nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as requiring any penal institution to..
More
ORDER
CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant BORTOLEMEDI seeks an order from the Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(4), to permit defendant's counsel to conduct the deposition of plaintiff AARON STRIBLING via videoconference.
Having read defense counsel's request,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. Defendant's request to conduct plaintiff's deposition via videoconference is GRANTED.
2. Nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as requiring any penal institution to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available.
Source: Leagle
