Cartagena v. Pham, 1:16-cv-01486-AWI-EPG. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20161114f17
Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 31, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 31, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS HIEN N. PHAM AND JENNIFER N. PHAM TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective attorneys that Defendants HIEN N. PHAM and JENNIFER N. PHAM may have additional time within which to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Therefore, the last day for said Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is Thu
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS HIEN N. PHAM AND JENNIFER N. PHAM TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective attorneys that Defendants HIEN N. PHAM and JENNIFER N. PHAM may have additional time within which to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Therefore, the last day for said Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is Thur..
More
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS HIEN N. PHAM AND JENNIFER N. PHAM TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective attorneys that Defendants HIEN N. PHAM and JENNIFER N. PHAM may have additional time within which to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Therefore, the last day for said Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is Thursday, November 17, 2016.
Good cause exists for this extension as defense counsel requires additional time to become sufficiently knowledgeable about this action to prepare an initial pleading.
This document is being electronically filed through the Court's ECF System. In this regard, counsel for the aforementioned Defendants attests as follows: (1) the contents of this document are acceptable to all persons required to sign the document; (2) Plaintiff's counsel has concurred with the filing of this document; and (3) a record supporting this concurrence is available for inspection or production, if so ordered by this Court.
ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED. Defendants HIEN N. PHAM and JENNIFER N. PHAM should answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint filed by Plaintiff on or before Thursday, November 17, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
