United States ex rel. Strunck v. Mallinckrodt Ard LLC, 12-175 (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20200123f61
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jan. 22, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 22, 2020
Summary: ORDER BERLE M. SCHILLER , District Judge . AND NOW , this 21 st day of January 2020 , upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Government's Complaint in Intervention and to Strike Portions Thereof (Document No. 73), the Government's Response, and Defendant's Reply, and for the reasons set forth in this Court's Memorandum dated January 21, 2020, it is ORDERED : 1. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED . 2. Defendant's Motion to Strike is DENIED . 3. Defendant's Motio
Summary: ORDER BERLE M. SCHILLER , District Judge . AND NOW , this 21 st day of January 2020 , upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Government's Complaint in Intervention and to Strike Portions Thereof (Document No. 73), the Government's Response, and Defendant's Reply, and for the reasons set forth in this Court's Memorandum dated January 21, 2020, it is ORDERED : 1. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED . 2. Defendant's Motion to Strike is DENIED . 3. Defendant's Motion..
More
ORDER
BERLE M. SCHILLER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 21st day of January 2020, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Government's Complaint in Intervention and to Strike Portions Thereof (Document No. 73), the Government's Response, and Defendant's Reply, and for the reasons set forth in this Court's Memorandum dated January 21, 2020, it is ORDERED:
1. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED.
2. Defendant's Motion to Strike is DENIED.
3. Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration (Document No. 72 in Civ. A. 12-175; Document No. 56 in Civ. A. 13-1776) is DENIED as moot.
Source: Leagle
