RANSOM v. BYRD, 4:13CV00444 SWW/JTR. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20141106854
Visitors: 19
Filed: Nov. 05, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 05, 2014
Summary: ORDER SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THERE
Summary: ORDER SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREF..
More
ORDER
SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Time and Motions to Amend Complaint (docs. 30, 36, and 39) are DENIED.
2. Defendant's Motion to Extend Time to File Dispositive Motions (doc. 31) is GRANTED, nunc pro tunc.
3. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 32) is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE.
Source: Leagle
