Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

GARRETT v. ANDREWS, 4:12CV00230-JLH-JTK. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20130816736 Visitors: 5
Filed: Aug. 13, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 13, 2013
Summary: ORDER JEROME T. KEARNEY, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Garrett has filed an Objection (Doc. No. 134) to this Court's July 17, 2013 Order (Doc. No. 130) listing the witnesses to be allowed at his August 21, 2013 Evidentiary Hearing. Although Plaintiff states that five witnesses are "vital" to his case, he does not include a summary of their expected testimony. Two of the these proposed witnesses, James Britt and Chris Smith, were listed on his original witness request, but the summary of their ex
More

ORDER

JEROME T. KEARNEY, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff Garrett has filed an Objection (Doc. No. 134) to this Court's July 17, 2013 Order (Doc. No. 130) listing the witnesses to be allowed at his August 21, 2013 Evidentiary Hearing. Although Plaintiff states that five witnesses are "vital" to his case, he does not include a summary of their expected testimony. Two of the these proposed witnesses, James Britt and Chris Smith, were listed on his original witness request, but the summary of their expected testimony did not relate to the incidents at issue in Plaintiff's case. The other three witnesses — Ronald Britton, Randy Gwatney, and Michael Furman — were not included on Plaintiff's original witness request, and Plaintiff does not offer any summary of their expected testimony. Therefore, Plaintiff's Objection is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer