U.S. v. SANDERS, 1:14-cv-01443-AWI-SKO. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20150114j65
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jan. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 14, 2015
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT THE SUMMONS BE ENFORCED ANTHONY ISHII, Senior District Judge. On November 19, 2014, the Magistrate Judge Issued Findings and Recommendations that the IRS summons be enforced. These Findings and Recommendations were served on all parties appearing in the action and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within ten (10) days after service of the order. No objections were filed. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636 (
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT THE SUMMONS BE ENFORCED ANTHONY ISHII, Senior District Judge. On November 19, 2014, the Magistrate Judge Issued Findings and Recommendations that the IRS summons be enforced. These Findings and Recommendations were served on all parties appearing in the action and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within ten (10) days after service of the order. No objections were filed. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636 (b..
More
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT THE SUMMONS BE ENFORCED
ANTHONY ISHII, Senior District Judge.
On November 19, 2014, the Magistrate Judge Issued Findings and Recommendations that the IRS summons be enforced. These Findings and Recommendations were served on all parties appearing in the action and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within ten (10) days after service of the order. No objections were filed.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The IRS summons served upon Respondent, Alma D. Sanders, on March 14, 2014, is ENFORCED;
2. Respondent is ORDERED to have produced documents on December 3, 2014 and to have appeared by telephone on December 10, 2014, at 11:00 a.m., by having called the direct line of RO Moses, (559) 443-7636, or his designated representative, as agreed to by RO Moses and Respondent Sanders at the show cause hearing;
3. If the December 10, 2014, telephonic appearance needed to be continued or rescheduled, it should be set in writing for a later date by RO Moses;
4. Respondent is to have appeared then by telephone with RO Moses or his designated representative, then and there to be sworn, to give testimony, and to produce for examining and copying any additional books, checks, records, papers and other data demanded by the summons, the examination to continue from day to day until completed;
5. The United States shall file a Status Report regarding Respondent's compliance with the summons by no later than January 21, 2015;
6. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce its order by its contempt power; and
7. THE CLERK SHALL SERVE this and further orders by mail to Alma D. Sanders, 6356 N. Palm Avenue, Fresno, CA 93704-1440.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
