Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

REECE v. CAREY, CIV S-09-1350-GEB-CMK-P. (2012)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20120301b16 Visitors: 10
Filed: Feb. 29, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 29, 2012
Summary: ORDER GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., District Judge. Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. On January 26, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within a specified time. No objections to th
More

ORDER

GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., District Judge.

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules.

On January 26, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 26, 2012, are adopted in full;

2. Defendant's motion to dismiss (Doc. 33) is denied; and

3. Defendant Dickenson shall file an answer to plaintiff's third amended complaint within 20 days of the date of this order.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer