Filed: Jun. 17, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 17, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: (1) EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD, (2) SETTING A COORDINATED BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS L.R. 144(a) MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , District Judge . STIPULATION Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), it is stipulated between and among Plaintiff Jacklyn Haddix and Defendants General Mills, Inc., General Mills Sales, Inc., General Mills Operations, LLC ("Defendants"), by their respective attorneys as follows: WHEREAS, Defendants received service of Pl
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: (1) EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD, (2) SETTING A COORDINATED BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS L.R. 144(a) MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , District Judge . STIPULATION Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), it is stipulated between and among Plaintiff Jacklyn Haddix and Defendants General Mills, Inc., General Mills Sales, Inc., General Mills Operations, LLC ("Defendants"), by their respective attorneys as follows: WHEREAS, Defendants received service of Pla..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: (1) EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD, (2) SETTING A COORDINATED BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS
L.R. 144(a)
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., District Judge.
STIPULATION
Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), it is stipulated between and among Plaintiff Jacklyn Haddix and Defendants General Mills, Inc., General Mills Sales, Inc., General Mills Operations, LLC ("Defendants"), by their respective attorneys as follows:
WHEREAS, Defendants received service of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint on June 7, 2016;
WHEREAS, Defendants' response to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is presently due June 24, 2016;
WHEREAS, this action was previously deemed related to the action Nava, et. al. v. General Mills, No. 15-cv-2262 (Dkt. No. 16) per Local Rule 123(a);
WHEREAS, Plaintiff in the Nava action recently filed a First Amended Complaint (Nava, et. al. v. General Mills, No. 15-cv-2262, Dkt. No. 22 (May 25, 2016));
WHEREAS, in the interests of judicial efficiency and conserving party resources, counsel for Plaintiff and Defendants in this action have conferred, and counsel for Defendants conferred with counsel for Plaintiffs in the Nava action; and
WHEREAS, in both actions the parties have reached an agreement on the briefing and hearing schedule set forth below with respect to Defendants' motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint ("Motion"), so that the issues presented by the parties' briefing in these related cases will be submitted to the Court in a coordinated fashion;
WHEREAS, this is the first request for an extension in this case;
WHEREAS, this stipulation and request is being made as soon as the parties reached an agreement on a coordinated briefing schedule in both actions and is not being made for the purpose of delay;
WHEREAS, this extension will not alter any other currently-existing deadlines;
WHEREAS, a stipulation and proposed Order setting forth the same schedule was filed in Nava v. General Mills, No. 15-cv-2262, Dkt. No. 23 (June 13, 2016);
THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1. Defendants will file their Motion on or before July 8, 2016;
2. Plaintiff will file her opposition to the Motion on or before August 5, 2016;
3. Defendants will file their reply papers in support of the Motion on or before August 19, 2016;
4. The hearing on the Motion will be September 8, 2016, at 2:00 p.m.;
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation, Defendants will file their Motion on or before July 8, 2016. Plaintiff will file her opposition to the Motion on or before August 5, 2016. Defendants will file their reply papers in support of the Motion on or before August 19, 2016. The hearing on the Motion will be September 8, 2016, at 2:00 p.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
