Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bridgeforth v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC, 2:16-cv-01681-JAM-KJN. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20161212811 Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 08, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO SUBMIT THE CASE TO BINDING ARBITRATION JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Plaintiff APLONDA BRIDGEFORTH and Defendant AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES LLC, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to the following: 1. WHEREAS, it is stipulated and agreed by the parties to submit this case to neutral, binding arbitration at JAMS, pursuant to the parties' arbitration agreement which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 2. WHEREAS, the parties agree that Michael J.
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO SUBMIT THE CASE TO BINDING ARBITRATION

Plaintiff APLONDA BRIDGEFORTH and Defendant AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES LLC, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to the following:

1. WHEREAS, it is stipulated and agreed by the parties to submit this case to neutral, binding arbitration at JAMS, pursuant to the parties' arbitration agreement which is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

2. WHEREAS, the parties agree that Michael J. Loeb shall serve as Arbitrator in this matter and that JAMS Employment Rules & Procedures shall govern the arbitration, unless the parties agree otherwise.

THEREFORE, the parties request that this Court order that this case be referred to binding contractual arbitration in accordance with the parties' Agreement. The parties also request that the above-captioned action be stayed until the arbitration is completed or the case is dismissed.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. All pending hearing dates before this court are ordered vacated.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer