FORTINET, INC. v. SOPHOS, INC., 3:13-cv-05831-EMC. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20151222a42
Visitors: 25
Filed: Dec. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 18, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Fortinet, Inc., Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs Sophos, Inc. and Sophos Ltd., and Defendants Michael Valentine and Jason Clark, through their attorneys of record and subject to the approval of the Court, that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), all claims and counterclaims in the above-captioned action are dis
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Fortinet, Inc., Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs Sophos, Inc. and Sophos Ltd., and Defendants Michael Valentine and Jason Clark, through their attorneys of record and subject to the approval of the Court, that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), all claims and counterclaims in the above-captioned action are dism..
More
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Fortinet, Inc., Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs Sophos, Inc. and Sophos Ltd., and Defendants Michael Valentine and Jason Clark, through their attorneys of record and subject to the approval of the Court, that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), all claims and counterclaims in the above-captioned action are dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. All claims and counter-claims in the above-captioned action are dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and fees.
Source: Leagle
