MARKS v. PRIMERITUS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., 2:15-cv-1144 KJM AC. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160603b94
Visitors: 27
Filed: Jun. 02, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 02, 2016
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , District Judge . The parties have submitted a stipulation and proposed protective order. ECF No. 13. The matter has accordingly been referred to the magistrate judge by E.D. Cal. ("Local Rule") 301(c)(1). The stipulation makes no specific reference to Local Rules 140, 141 and 141.1, governing privacy, the sealing of documents and protective orders. However, it is the court's understanding that the stipulation's references to "the Local Rules of this Court" indicate t
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , District Judge . The parties have submitted a stipulation and proposed protective order. ECF No. 13. The matter has accordingly been referred to the magistrate judge by E.D. Cal. ("Local Rule") 301(c)(1). The stipulation makes no specific reference to Local Rules 140, 141 and 141.1, governing privacy, the sealing of documents and protective orders. However, it is the court's understanding that the stipulation's references to "the Local Rules of this Court" indicate th..
More
ORDER
ALLISON CLAIRE, District Judge.
The parties have submitted a stipulation and proposed protective order. ECF No. 13. The matter has accordingly been referred to the magistrate judge by E.D. Cal. ("Local Rule") 301(c)(1).
The stipulation makes no specific reference to Local Rules 140, 141 and 141.1, governing privacy, the sealing of documents and protective orders. However, it is the court's understanding that the stipulation's references to "the Local Rules of this Court" indicate that the parties know these specific rules and have incorporated them into their stipulation.
With this understanding, the stipulation (ECF No. 13) is SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
