Thornton v. Amtrak, Compass Transportation, Inc., 17-cv-316935. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20181016d12
Visitors: 15
Filed: Oct. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 15, 2018
Summary: AGREED STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL JOSEPH C. SPERO , District Judge . Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), Plaintiff LOUISE THORNTON ("Plaintiff") and Defendant COMPASS TRANSPORTATION, INC. ("Compass") and Defendant AMTRAK ("Amtrak") (collectively the parties), being all parties who entered an appearance in the above-referenced proceeding, hereby jointly and mutually stipulate to the dismissal of all claims asserted herein by virtue of any pleading entered or filed in this
Summary: AGREED STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL JOSEPH C. SPERO , District Judge . Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), Plaintiff LOUISE THORNTON ("Plaintiff") and Defendant COMPASS TRANSPORTATION, INC. ("Compass") and Defendant AMTRAK ("Amtrak") (collectively the parties), being all parties who entered an appearance in the above-referenced proceeding, hereby jointly and mutually stipulate to the dismissal of all claims asserted herein by virtue of any pleading entered or filed in this ..
More
AGREED STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
JOSEPH C. SPERO, District Judge.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), Plaintiff LOUISE THORNTON ("Plaintiff") and Defendant COMPASS TRANSPORTATION, INC. ("Compass") and Defendant AMTRAK ("Amtrak") (collectively the parties), being all parties who entered an appearance in the above-referenced proceeding, hereby jointly and mutually stipulate to the dismissal of all claims asserted herein by virtue of any pleading entered or filed in this proceeding, with prejudice to refiling.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
