Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Thomas v. County of San Bernardino, CV 19-00167-DMG (SK). (2020)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20200107945 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 06, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 06, 2020
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART COUNTY'S MOTION TO DISMISS DOLLY M. GEE , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed all relevant records in this case and the attached Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The time for objections has passed with none filed. The Court thus concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. THEREFORE, the County's Motion
More

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART COUNTY'S MOTION TO DISMISS

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed all relevant records in this case and the attached Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The time for objections has passed with none filed. The Court thus concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge.

THEREFORE, the County's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as set forth in the Report and Recommendation. The County and Defendant J. Estrada must file their answers to the surviving claims in the complaint, as described in the Report and Recommendation, within 14 days of this order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4)(A). The case remains referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge for pretrial proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer