Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

PINSON v. 45 DEVELOPMENT, LLC, 2:12-CV-02160. (2013)

Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20130710647 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 09, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 09, 2013
Summary: ORDER P.K. HOLMES, III, Chief District Judge. Currently before the Court is the parties' consent motion (Doc. 115) for extension of time to complete discovery and otherwise amend certain deadlines contained in the Final Scheduling Order (Doc. 54). By agreement of the parties, IT IS ORDERED that the consent motion (Doc. 115) is GRANTED. Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the discovery deadline is extended to August 14, 2013. The parties are reminded that, pursuant to the Final Schedulin
More

ORDER

P.K. HOLMES, III, Chief District Judge.

Currently before the Court is the parties' consent motion (Doc. 115) for extension of time to complete discovery and otherwise amend certain deadlines contained in the Final Scheduling Order (Doc. 54).

By agreement of the parties, IT IS ORDERED that the consent motion (Doc. 115) is GRANTED.

Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the discovery deadline is extended to August 14, 2013. The parties are reminded that, pursuant to the Final Scheduling Order, they may conduct discovery beyond the deadline if all parties are in agreement to do so; however, the Court will not resolve any disputes in the course of any such extended discovery. (Doc. 54, ¶ 2).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for motions (except motions in limine) is extended to August 22, 2013, with responses due on or before September 5, 2013 and subsequent replies, if any, due on or before September 12, 2013 or the date the response or reply would otherwise be due pursuant to the Federal or Local Rules, whichever is earlier.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for requesting a settlement conference is extended to August 22, 2013. The parties are, however, strongly encouraged to request a settlement conference, if desired, as soon as possible, so as not to burden the schedule of the Magistrate by attempting to arrange a conference at the last minute.

All other provisions and deadlines of the Final Scheduling Order remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer