IN RE EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS CREDIT REPORTING LITIGATION, C 16-05674 WHA (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170321852
Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 20, 2017
Summary: ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . In ten of the above-captioned cases, a combined motion to dismiss is scheduled for hearing on March 23. This particular action, Bennett v. Experian, 3:17-cv-00506-WHA, is not a part of that combined motion. Defendants in this action, however, shall have until 28 DAYS after the Court rules on the aforementioned combined motion to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. The pending stip
Summary: ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . In ten of the above-captioned cases, a combined motion to dismiss is scheduled for hearing on March 23. This particular action, Bennett v. Experian, 3:17-cv-00506-WHA, is not a part of that combined motion. Defendants in this action, however, shall have until 28 DAYS after the Court rules on the aforementioned combined motion to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. The pending stipu..
More
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
In ten of the above-captioned cases, a combined motion to dismiss is scheduled for hearing on March 23. This particular action, Bennett v. Experian, 3:17-cv-00506-WHA, is not a part of that combined motion. Defendants in this action, however, shall have until 28 DAYS after the Court rules on the aforementioned combined motion to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. The pending stipulated requests to extend the time for defendants Experian Information Solutions, Inc., and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., to respond to the complaint (Dkt. Nos. 14, 16) are DENIED as inconsistent with this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
