Estate of Chaiken v. U.S., 16-mc-80155-DMR. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20161205e60
Visitors: 14
Filed: Dec. 05, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 05, 2016
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Re: Dkt. No. 36 DONNA M. RYU , Magistrate Judge . On November 30, 2016, the court ordered Petitioner Estate of Carole Chaiken to file a response to the government's October 28, 2016 supplemental brief (Docket No. 32) by no later than December 2, 2016. [Docket No. 36.] Petitioner did not file a supplemental brief or otherwise respond to the court's order. Therefore, by no later than December 8, 2016, Petitioner Estate of Carole Chaiken shall show cause in writing why it
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Re: Dkt. No. 36 DONNA M. RYU , Magistrate Judge . On November 30, 2016, the court ordered Petitioner Estate of Carole Chaiken to file a response to the government's October 28, 2016 supplemental brief (Docket No. 32) by no later than December 2, 2016. [Docket No. 36.] Petitioner did not file a supplemental brief or otherwise respond to the court's order. Therefore, by no later than December 8, 2016, Petitioner Estate of Carole Chaiken shall show cause in writing why it s..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Re: Dkt. No. 36
DONNA M. RYU, Magistrate Judge.
On November 30, 2016, the court ordered Petitioner Estate of Carole Chaiken to file a response to the government's October 28, 2016 supplemental brief (Docket No. 32) by no later than December 2, 2016. [Docket No. 36.] Petitioner did not file a supplemental brief or otherwise respond to the court's order. Therefore, by no later than December 8, 2016, Petitioner Estate of Carole Chaiken shall show cause in writing why it should not be sanctioned for failing to comply with the court's order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
