WALDOW v. ELI LILLY & COMPANY, 2:13-cv-00789-KJM-EFB. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20150518682
Visitors: 5
Filed: May 15, 2015
Latest Update: May 15, 2015
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . Defendant Eli Lilly and Company ("Lilly") moves ex parte to amend the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference Order, ECF No. 30, to continue two deadlines: (1) the deadline to hear motions to compel discovery and (2) the deadline for expert disclosures. ECF No. 68. Under the Local Rules of this District, a court may, in its discretion, grant an initial extension ex parte upon a declaration from counsel explaining why an extension is necessar
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . Defendant Eli Lilly and Company ("Lilly") moves ex parte to amend the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference Order, ECF No. 30, to continue two deadlines: (1) the deadline to hear motions to compel discovery and (2) the deadline for expert disclosures. ECF No. 68. Under the Local Rules of this District, a court may, in its discretion, grant an initial extension ex parte upon a declaration from counsel explaining why an extension is necessary..
More
ORDER
KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.
Defendant Eli Lilly and Company ("Lilly") moves ex parte to amend the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference Order, ECF No. 30, to continue two deadlines: (1) the deadline to hear motions to compel discovery and (2) the deadline for expert disclosures. ECF No. 68.
Under the Local Rules of this District, a court may, in its discretion, grant an initial extension ex parte upon a declaration from counsel explaining why an extension is necessary and why a stipulation cannot be obtained. E.D. Cal. L.R. 144(c). Defense counsel has filed such a declaration, explaining that plaintiff has not responded to any of the defense's discovery requests since the withdrawal of plaintiff's counsel, and defendant is unclear whether plaintiff intends to continue pursuing this litigation. ECF No. 68-2 at 2-3.
After reviewing the arguments and evidence, the application is granted. The scheduling order is amended to vacate the current deadline to disclose experts by May 15, 2015, as well as the deadline to hear motions to compel discovery by June 15, 2015. The court will issue an amended scheduling order setting further deadlines, if necessary, following the scheduled June 11, 2015 status conference, where plaintiff is directed to appear and indicate whether she intends to seek counsel and continue pursuing this litigation.
The motion is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
