Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Previvo Genetics, LLC v. Pagidas, 3:16-cv-02261 EMC. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160825967 Visitors: 10
Filed: Aug. 24, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 24, 2016
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PREVIVO TO FILE ITS OPPOSITION TO PAGIDAS' MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO TRANSFER TO THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . WHEREAS, on August 4, 2016, Defendant Kelly Pagidas ("Pagidas") filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, or in the Alternative Motion to Transfer to the District of Rhode Island ("Motion") (Dkt. No. 23
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PREVIVO TO FILE ITS OPPOSITION TO PAGIDAS' MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO TRANSFER TO THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

WHEREAS, on August 4, 2016, Defendant Kelly Pagidas ("Pagidas") filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, or in the Alternative Motion to Transfer to the District of Rhode Island ("Motion") (Dkt. No. 23).

WHEREAS Plaintiff Previvo Genetics, LLC's ("Previvo") Opposition to the Motion is currently due on August 25, 2016 and Pagidas' Reply to Previvo's Opposition due on September 7, 2016. (Dkt. No. 29.)

WHEREAS the parties have agreed to extend the deadline for filing Previvo's Opposition to the Motion to September 1, 2016 and Pagidas' Reply to Previvo's Opposition to September 14, 2016.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties that Previvo may have an extension of time up to and including August 29, 2016 to file its Opposition to the Motion. Pagidas' Reply to Previvo's Opposition will be due on or before September 8, 2016.

ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. (as modified on p. 2, lines 5-6.)

IT IS SO ORDERED AS MODIFIED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer