Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

De La Torre v. Charles Tyrwhitt, Inc., 5:14-cv-04603-BLF. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150120963 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jan. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 16, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT BETH LABSON FREEMAN, District Judge. Plaintiff Paul De La Torre ("Plaintiff" or "De La Torre") and Defendant Charles Tyrwhitt, LLP ("Defendant" or "Tyrwhitt") make this stipulation with reference to the following facts: (1) On December 3, 2014, Mr. De La Torre and Tyrwhitt stipulated that Tyrwhitt's deadline for responding to the Amended Complaint would be extended to January 16, 2015, or o
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

BETH LABSON FREEMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Paul De La Torre ("Plaintiff" or "De La Torre") and Defendant Charles Tyrwhitt, LLP ("Defendant" or "Tyrwhitt") make this stipulation with reference to the following facts:

(1) On December 3, 2014, Mr. De La Torre and Tyrwhitt stipulated that Tyrwhitt's deadline for responding to the Amended Complaint would be extended to January 16, 2015, or on such later date as the Parties may subsequently agree under the terms of the local rules;

(2) On December 4, 2014, Mr. De La Torre filed an Amended Complaint;

(3) Plaintiff and Defendant have been engaging in settlement negotiations and hope to resolve the dispute prior to further litigation. Thus, both parties agree to extend the deadline for Defendant's response to February 27, 2015, or on such later date as the parties may subsequently agree under the terms of the local rules;

(4) Currently scheduled is a Case Management Conference set for hearing on March 3, 2015, with a statement due date of February 24, 2015.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES, by and through their undersigned counsel of record:

(1) The deadline for Defendant to respond to the Amended Complaint shall be February 27, 2015, or on such later date as the parties may subsequently agree under the terms of the local rules.

(2) The March 3, 2015 Case Management Conference date and the statement due date of February 24, 2015 are vacated. If the parties do not reach a settlement by February 27, 2015, they should jointly contact the court and arrange for a new date for the case management conference with the court's clerk.

IT IS SO STIPULATED,

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The Case Management Conference Statement due date of February 24, 2015, is hereby vacated. If the parties do not reach a settlement by February 27, 2015, they should jointly contact the court and arrange for a new date for the case management conference with the court's clerk.

The Initial Case Management Conference presently scheduled for March 3, 2015 is HEREBY CONTINUED to April 2, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. The parties' Joint Case Management Statement is due by March 26, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer