Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. BERRY, C-07-4431-RMW (HRL). (2011)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20110511b07 Visitors: 12
Filed: May 11, 2011
Latest Update: May 11, 2011
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT HOWARD R. LLOYD, Magistrate Judge. Whereas Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or "Commission") and Defendant Lisa C. Berry ("Ms. Berry") have reached an impasse over an expert discovery matter, despite efforts to meet and confer on the topic; Whereas the Commission has informed Ms. Berry's counsel that the Commission will file a motion pursuant to Rule 26(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil P
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT

HOWARD R. LLOYD, Magistrate Judge.

Whereas Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or "Commission") and Defendant Lisa C. Berry ("Ms. Berry") have reached an impasse over an expert discovery matter, despite efforts to meet and confer on the topic;

Whereas the Commission has informed Ms. Berry's counsel that the Commission will file a motion pursuant to Rule 26(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure seeking the Court's ruling on whether each party should be required to incur the costs of any fees charged by experts the party has itself retained for this litigation in connection with depositions of such persons by the opposing party;

Whereas the expeditious determination of this issue will aid in the timely payment of experts retained for this litigation;

Whereas the proposed briefing schedule, and the hearing on shortened notice should the Court determine that a hearing is necessary, will not affect any of the other dates in this case;

It is therefore stipulated and agreed, and the parties ask the Court to adopt as its order, the following schedule for briefing, and to the extent the Court deems necessary hearing, the Commission's motion:

SEC to file motion: May 12, 201, by or before 1:00 p.m. Ms. Berry to respond to SEC's motion: May 12, 2011, by or before 6:00 p.m. SEC to file reply: May 18, 2011 Hearing on motion, if the Court determines to hold a hearing: May 24, 2011

The Commission's undersigned counsel of record, Susan F. LaMarca, hereby attests that Amy Ross concurs in the filing of this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order in accordance with General Order No. 45, Electronic Case Filing, section 10(b).

ORDER

SEC to file motion: May 12, 201, by or before 1:00 p.m.

Ms. Berry to respond to SEC's motion: May 12, 2011, by or before 6:00 p.m.

SEC to file reply: May 18, 2011

Hearing on motion: May 24, 2011

Unless the Court notifies the parties otherwise, no hearing will be set for this motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer