Williams v. Bell, 1:16-cv-01584-LJO-SAB (PC). (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20191105916
Visitors: 9
Filed: Nov. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 04, 2019
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED ON DEFENDANTS FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER [ECF No. 105] STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff John Wesley Williams is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On October 24, 2019, the Court directed Defendants to file a response to Plaintiff's fourth motion for an extension of time to file an opposition to their pending motion for summary judgment. Defendants have not filed a re
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED ON DEFENDANTS FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER [ECF No. 105] STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff John Wesley Williams is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On October 24, 2019, the Court directed Defendants to file a response to Plaintiff's fourth motion for an extension of time to file an opposition to their pending motion for summary judgment. Defendants have not filed a res..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED ON DEFENDANTS FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER [ECF No. 105]
STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff John Wesley Williams is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On October 24, 2019, the Court directed Defendants to file a response to Plaintiff's fourth motion for an extension of time to file an opposition to their pending motion for summary judgment. Defendants have not filed a response and the time to do so has now expired. Accordingly, within seven (7) days from the date of service of this order, Defendants shall show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with a court order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
