Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SAVIN v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, 3:16-CV-05627-JST. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170607a51 Visitors: 22
Filed: Jun. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 06, 2017
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Plaintiff KATHERINE SAVIN ("Plaintiff") and Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, THE ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF SAN FRANCISCO, A Corporation Sole (erroneously sued as the ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO) ("ASF"), FATHER BRUCE LERY, and Cross-Defendant REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ("Regents") by and through their counsel of record, jointly enter into the follo
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Plaintiff KATHERINE SAVIN ("Plaintiff") and Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, THE ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF SAN FRANCISCO, A Corporation Sole (erroneously sued as the ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO) ("ASF"), FATHER BRUCE LERY, and Cross-Defendant REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ("Regents") by and through their counsel of record, jointly enter into the following stipulation:

WHEREAS, the Case Management Conference ("CMC") is currently scheduled for June 14, 2017.

WHEREAS, the parties agree and stipulate that good cause exists to continue the existing CMC for a period of approximately 30 days, as (1) Plaintiff's lead trial counsel, David M. Poore is not available on June 14, 2017, as he will be out of the state on a pre-paid vacation, with limited email and telephone access; (2) Defendant Father Lery's status as a party in this action remains uncertain, as his Motion to Dismiss is pending for a ruling; and (3) there remains a question as to the proper service of Defendants Harris and Kinderman, who are physicians with the Regents. Defendants Harris and Kinderman have not yet appeared in the action, and the parties are presently meeting and conferring about whether or not they have been properly served. The parties respectfully request a continuance of the CMC, so that all lead trial counsel can attend, and the parties can finalize any service issues with respect to the individual Defendants.

As Counsel for Defendant City and County of San Francisco has a trial that is set to begin on July 17, 2017, the parties respectfully request a CMC hearing date of July 12, 2017, if possible.

THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate that the Case Management Conference be continued from June 14, 2017, to July 12, 2017 (or as soon thereafter as the Court may deem proper).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3) ATTESTATION

I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories to this document.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

GOOD CAUSE SHOWING, the Stipulation is GRANTED.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the CMC hearing date of June 14, 2017, be continued to July 12, 2017, at 2:00 p.m.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer