U.S. v. LOPEZ, EDCR 08-0099-R. (2016)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20160202849
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jan. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 21, 2016
Summary: ORDER OF DETENTION AFTER HEARING (Fed.R.Crim.P. 32.1 (a) (6) 18 U.S.C. 3143 (a) Allegations of Violations of Probation/Supervised Release Conditions) FREDERICK F. MUMM , Magistrate Judge . On arrest warrant issued by the United States District Court for the central Dist. of Ct. involving alleged violations of conditions of probation/supervised release: 1. The court finds that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure: A. ( ) the appearance of defendant as requir
Summary: ORDER OF DETENTION AFTER HEARING (Fed.R.Crim.P. 32.1 (a) (6) 18 U.S.C. 3143 (a) Allegations of Violations of Probation/Supervised Release Conditions) FREDERICK F. MUMM , Magistrate Judge . On arrest warrant issued by the United States District Court for the central Dist. of Ct. involving alleged violations of conditions of probation/supervised release: 1. The court finds that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure: A. ( ) the appearance of defendant as require..
More
ORDER OF DETENTION AFTER HEARING (Fed.R.Crim.P. 32.1 (a) (6) 18 U.S.C. § 3143 (a) Allegations of Violations of Probation/Supervised Release Conditions)
FREDERICK F. MUMM, Magistrate Judge.
On arrest warrant issued by the United States District Court for the central Dist. of Ct. involving alleged violations of conditions of probation/supervised release:
1. The court finds that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure:
A. (✓) the appearance of defendant as required; and/or
B. (✓) the safety of any person or the community.
2. The Court concludes:
A. (✓) Defendant has failed to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that he is not likely to pose a risk to the safety of any other persons or the community. Defendant poses a risk to the safety of other persons or the community based on: See PSA report _________________________________________________________
B. (✓) Defendant has failed to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that he is not likely to flee of released. Defendant poses a flight risk based on: See PSA report _________________________________________________________
IT IS ORDERED that defendant be detained.
Source: Leagle
