NEWBY v. APPLUS RTD USA SERVICES, INC., 1:16-cv-01233-DAD-JLT (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20161122878
Visitors: 1
Filed: Nov. 18, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 18, 2016
Summary: ORDER REASSIGNING THE ACTION (Doc. No. 44) DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . Both parties in the above-captioned case have consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction over this case for all purposes, including trial and entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(a)(5) and (c). (Doc. Nos. 8 at 1; 11 at 8.) 1 Accordingly, this court reassigns the action to United States Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston for all further proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(1). All filings in
Summary: ORDER REASSIGNING THE ACTION (Doc. No. 44) DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . Both parties in the above-captioned case have consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction over this case for all purposes, including trial and entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(a)(5) and (c). (Doc. Nos. 8 at 1; 11 at 8.) 1 Accordingly, this court reassigns the action to United States Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston for all further proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(1). All filings in ..
More
ORDER REASSIGNING THE ACTION
(Doc. No. 44)
DALE A. DROZD, District Judge.
Both parties in the above-captioned case have consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction over this case for all purposes, including trial and entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(a)(5) and (c). (Doc. Nos. 8 at 1; 11 at 8.)1 Accordingly, this court reassigns the action to United States Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston for all further proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). All filings in this action shall now bear the new case number:
All currently scheduled dates in this action before Judge Drozd are hereby vacated.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Defendant's consent appears in a joint scheduling report recently filed by the parties. (Doc. No. 11 at 8.) Defendant's counsel is ordered to file a written form specifically consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) within fourteen days of the date of this order.
Source: Leagle
