Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Buchanan v. Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd., 4:15-cv-01696-YGR (SK). (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180611622 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 08, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION RE: Dkt. No.: 349 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , >District Judge . Having considered Plaintiffs' Motion for a one-week Extension of Time to file responses in opposition to Defendant Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd.'s Motions to Compel Arbitration (Dkt. #331), the Court finds that good cause exists to grant the requested relief. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion is hereby GRANTED, and
More

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

RE: Dkt. No.: 349

Having considered Plaintiffs' Motion for a one-week Extension of Time to file responses in opposition to Defendant Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd.'s Motions to Compel Arbitration (Dkt. #331), the Court finds that good cause exists to grant the requested relief. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion is hereby GRANTED, and the deadline for Plaintiffs to file their response to Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration is extended from June 12, 2018 to June 19, 2018. Additionally, the deadline for Defendant to file its reply in support of its Motion is extended from June 16, 2018 to July 3, 2018.

This Order terminates Docket Number 349.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer