Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Robinson v. Karagheuoff, 1:18-cv-00042-LJO-BAM. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180412883 Visitors: 27
Filed: Apr. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 11, 2018
Summary: ORDER VACATING JUDGMENT AND REOPENING CASE LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . Judgment was issued on April 9, 2018, as the docket reflected Plaintiff had failed to file an amended complaint within the time requirements set by the Court's March 13, 2018, order. However, due to clerical mistake, the Plaintiff's amended complaint was timely filed on April 6, 2018, 1 but not docketed until after the order of judgment was signed on April 9, 2018. As a result, the Court's judgment was
More

ORDER VACATING JUDGMENT AND REOPENING CASE

Judgment was issued on April 9, 2018, as the docket reflected Plaintiff had failed to file an amended complaint within the time requirements set by the Court's March 13, 2018, order. However, due to clerical mistake, the Plaintiff's amended complaint was timely filed on April 6, 2018,1 but not docketed until after the order of judgment was signed on April 9, 2018. As a result, the Court's judgment was issued in error, and the judgment is vacated pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1).

As such, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the April 9, 2018, judgment is VACATED, and the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to reopen this case. A response deadline to the amended complaint shall be calculated from the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Plaintiff was permitted 21 days from March 13, 2018, to file an amended complaint — i.e., April 3, 2018. In compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6, an extension of three days for mailing was also permitted. As such, an amended complaint was to be filed on or before April 6, 2018. Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 6(b).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer