Hung v. Saks & Company, LLC, CV 18-10594 FMO (SKx). (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190403b82
Visitors: 21
Filed: Apr. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 02, 2019
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FERNANDO M. OLGUIN , District Judge . The complaint in the above-captioned case contains individual and class allegations. Plaintiff has filed a voluntary notice of dismissal pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, seeking to dismiss the individual claims with prejudice and the class claims without prejudice. ( See Dkt. 24, Voluntary Notice of Dismissal). Having reviewed the case file and determined that no prejudice to the putative class will result
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FERNANDO M. OLGUIN , District Judge . The complaint in the above-captioned case contains individual and class allegations. Plaintiff has filed a voluntary notice of dismissal pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, seeking to dismiss the individual claims with prejudice and the class claims without prejudice. ( See Dkt. 24, Voluntary Notice of Dismissal). Having reviewed the case file and determined that no prejudice to the putative class will result f..
More
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
FERNANDO M. OLGUIN, District Judge.
The complaint in the above-captioned case contains individual and class allegations. Plaintiff has filed a voluntary notice of dismissal pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, seeking to dismiss the individual claims with prejudice and the class claims without prejudice. (See Dkt. 24, Voluntary Notice of Dismissal).
Having reviewed the case file and determined that no prejudice to the putative class will result from the dismissal, IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to plaintiff and without prejudice as to the putative class. The dismissal shall be without costs.
Source: Leagle
