Shelley v. County of San Joaquin, 2:13-cv-00266-MCE-DAD. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160531912
Visitors: 4
Filed: May 05, 2016
Latest Update: May 05, 2016
Summary: ORDER ON DEFENDANT COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN'S APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THAT EXCEEDS TWENTY (20) PAGES MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , Chief District Judge . Having considered Defendant COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN's application for leave to file an initial brief in support of their motion for summary judgment that exceeds the twenty (20) page limitation, the application is hereby GRANTED, good cause appearing therefor. The page limitation for the initial brief in suppor
Summary: ORDER ON DEFENDANT COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN'S APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THAT EXCEEDS TWENTY (20) PAGES MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , Chief District Judge . Having considered Defendant COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN's application for leave to file an initial brief in support of their motion for summary judgment that exceeds the twenty (20) page limitation, the application is hereby GRANTED, good cause appearing therefor. The page limitation for the initial brief in support..
More
ORDER ON DEFENDANT COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN'S APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THAT EXCEEDS TWENTY (20) PAGES
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge.
Having considered Defendant COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN's application for leave to file an initial brief in support of their motion for summary judgment that exceeds the twenty (20) page limitation, the application is hereby GRANTED, good cause appearing therefor.
The page limitation for the initial brief in support of Defendant COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN's motion for summary judgment in the above-entitled action is hereby set at thirty-five (35) pages. A thirty-five (35) page limit shall also be imposed on Plaintiffs' opposition to the motion and a twenty (20) page limit imposed on defendants' reply brief in support of the motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle