Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

McQueen v. Brown, 2:15-cv-2544 JAM AC P. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190617734 Visitors: 21
Filed: Jun. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 13, 2019
Summary: ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Plaintiff, a state prisoner who now proceeds through counsel, 1 has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 27, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendatio
More

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner who now proceeds through counsel,1 has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On February 27, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days; that period was extended by stipulation of the parties. Both plaintiff and defendants have filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Additionally, for the reasons set forth in the findings and recommendations as well as the parties' respective objections, plaintiff will be granted leave to amend.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 27, 2019, are adopted as follows: defendants' motion to dismiss, ECF No. 21, is denied as to the Eighth Amendment claim, and granted as to the Equal Protection claim without prejudice to amendment;

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days after the filing date of this order to file a Second Amended Complaint; and

3. This case is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Counsel was appointed for plaintiff after the magistrate judge issued the subject findings and recommendations.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer