Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Hamberlin v. Target Corporation, 2:18-01035 WBS DB. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180501777 Visitors: 29
Filed: Apr. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER OF RECUSAL WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 455(b)(4), the undersigned hereby recuses himself as the judge to whom this case is assigned because the undersigned has a financial interest in Target Corporation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court reassign this case to another judge for all further proceedings, making appropriate adjustments in the assignments of civil cases to compensate for such reassignment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any
More

ORDER OF RECUSAL

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455(b)(4), the undersigned hereby recuses himself as the judge to whom this case is assigned because the undersigned has a financial interest in Target Corporation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court reassign this case to another judge for all further proceedings, making appropriate adjustments in the assignments of civil cases to compensate for such reassignment.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any previous orders issued by the undersigned judge in this case are hereby VACATED and SET ASIDE, and any dates previously set by the undersigned judge in this case are hereby VACATED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer