Holleman v. GHS Interactive Security, LLC, 1:18-cv-00745-LJO-SKO. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190321994
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 20, 2019
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE (Doc. 10) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . On March 18, 2019, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing Plaintiff Jacob Holleman's individual claims with prejudice, and the putative class claims without prejudice. (Doc. 10.) In light of the parties' stipulation, Plaintiff's individual claims have been dismissed with prejudice, the putative class claims have been dismissed without prejudice, and this action has been terminate
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE (Doc. 10) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . On March 18, 2019, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing Plaintiff Jacob Holleman's individual claims with prejudice, and the putative class claims without prejudice. (Doc. 10.) In light of the parties' stipulation, Plaintiff's individual claims have been dismissed with prejudice, the putative class claims have been dismissed without prejudice, and this action has been terminated..
More
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE
(Doc. 10)
SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.
On March 18, 2019, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing Plaintiff Jacob Holleman's individual claims with prejudice, and the putative class claims without prejudice. (Doc. 10.)
In light of the parties' stipulation, Plaintiff's individual claims have been dismissed with prejudice, the putative class claims have been dismissed without prejudice, and this action has been terminated. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
