Acosta v. Sienacorp, 1:18-cv-00622-DAD-EPG. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181024810
Visitors: 16
Filed: Oct. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 17, 2018
Summary: ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE (ECF No. 24) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . On October 16, 2018, Plaintiff Jose Acosta and Defendants Sienacorp, dba Me-N-Ed's Victory Grill and Cantina, and Phoenix Land Enterprises, LLC, filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice. (ECF No. 24.) In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose
Summary: ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE (ECF No. 24) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . On October 16, 2018, Plaintiff Jose Acosta and Defendants Sienacorp, dba Me-N-Ed's Victory Grill and Cantina, and Phoenix Land Enterprises, LLC, filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice. (ECF No. 24.) In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose,..
More
ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
(ECF No. 24)
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
On October 16, 2018, Plaintiff Jose Acosta and Defendants Sienacorp, dba Me-N-Ed's Victory Grill and Cantina, and Phoenix Land Enterprises, LLC, filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice. (ECF No. 24.) In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
