Moralez v. Gregoriante, 3:17-cv-02908-WHO. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180305799
Visitors: 2
Filed: Mar. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2018
Summary: CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . The court has been notified that the parties have agreed to settle this case. IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and any hearings scheduled in this matter are VACATED. It is further ordered that if any party certifies to this Court, with proper notice to opposing counsel within ninety (90) days from the date below, that settlement has not in fact occurred, this order shall be vacated and this
Summary: CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . The court has been notified that the parties have agreed to settle this case. IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and any hearings scheduled in this matter are VACATED. It is further ordered that if any party certifies to this Court, with proper notice to opposing counsel within ninety (90) days from the date below, that settlement has not in fact occurred, this order shall be vacated and this ..
More
CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
The court has been notified that the parties have agreed to settle this case.
IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and any hearings scheduled in this matter are VACATED. It is further ordered that if any party certifies to this Court, with proper notice to opposing counsel within ninety (90) days from the date below, that settlement has not in fact occurred, this order shall be vacated and this cause shall be restored to the calendar for further proceedings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
