Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Burris v. City of Petaluma, 4:18-cv-02102-HSG. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180808893 Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 07, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND RE-SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT DATES HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . TO THE COURT AND ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: WHEREAS, this putative collective action was filed on April 6, 2018, asserting the City of Petaluma, the named Defendant in this action, violated the overtime payment provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"). WHEREAS, the City was
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND RE-SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT DATES

TO THE COURT AND ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

WHEREAS, this putative collective action was filed on April 6, 2018, asserting the City of Petaluma, the named Defendant in this action, violated the overtime payment provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA").

WHEREAS, the City was served the Summons and Complaint on April 16, 2018;

WHEREAS, pursuant to stipulation, the City's response to the Complaint is presently due on or by August 10, 2018 (see Dkt. No. 20);

WHEREAS, the Parties have begun settlement discussions in an effort to resolve this action, which has included the City providing Plaintiffs with payroll records and other information pertinent to their claims;

WHEREAS, the Parties attended a settlement conference on July 17, 2018;

WHEREAS, the Parties are continuing to meaningfully negotiate possible settlement;

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the City should be permitted to file a response to Plaintiff's Complaint no later than October 26, 2018 to enable the Parties to focus their resources on the settlement of this action;

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the initial Case Management Conference, currently set for August 28, 2018, should be moved to a date subsequent to October 26, 2018 — the proposed date for City to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), the Parties request a Court order extending the City's time to respond to the Complaint to October 26, 2018 and moving the initial Case Management Conference and related dates accordingly.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the Parties:

1) The City of Petaluma's time to file a response to Plaintiffs' Complaint shall be October 26, 2018; 2) The initial Case Management Conference is to be held on or after November 13, 2018, as the Court's calendar permits; 3) The Joint Case Management Statement must be filed not less than seven (7) calendar days prior to the Case Management Conference; and 4) The last day for the Parties to meet and confer per Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) be reset accordingly.

DECLARATION OF DAVID E. MASTAGNI

I, DAVID E. MASTAGNI, declare as follows:

1. I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice in the State of California and am specifically admitted to practice before the Northern District of California.

2. I am an attorney of record for Plaintiff in this action and make this declaration within my personal knowledge. If called upon to testify, I could and would testify competently with respect thereto.

3. Since June 2018, the Parties in this case have begun meaningful and concrete settlement discussions.

4. In furtherance of settlement discussions, Defendant has provided Plaintiffs with payroll records and other requested information pertinent to Plaintiffs' claims in the hopes of settling this matter without further litigation.

5. On July 17, 2018, the Parties met at City Hall to discuss settlement of this case. The discussions were productive and the Parties continue to engage in meaningful and concrete settlement negotiations.

6. The Parties now seek additional time to meaningfully explore early settlement of this matter. Prior to this, the Parties stipulated to extend the Defendant's time to respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint from May 7, 2018 to July 6, 2018, and then again stipulated to extend the Defendant's time to respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint from July 6, 2018 to August 10, 2018.

5. This extension, if granted, will impact the currently scheduled Case Management Conference, and related deadlines, set by the Court upon filing this action. For this reason, the Parties are requesting this Court to move the Case Management Conference to November 13, 2018 and re-set related dates accordingly.

6. I do not believe any party will be prejudiced by the granting Defendant an extension and continuing the Initial Case Management Conference and related deadlines, as set forth in the Parties' stipulation.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendant's time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint shall be extended to October 26, 2018;

2. The Initial Case Management Conference shall be continued to November 13, 2018 at 2:00 p.m.; and

3. The Parties must meet and confer per Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) and must file the Joint Case Management Statement not less than seven (7) calendar days prior to the Initial Case Management Conference.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer