CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. v. ARISTA NETWORKS, INC., 14-cv-05344 BLF (NC). (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160614773
Visitors: 19
Filed: Jun. 12, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2016
Summary: ORDER ADVANCING BRIEFING ON ARISTA'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY Re: Dkt. No. 278 NATHANAEL M. COUSINS , Magistrate Judge . Cisco must respond to Arista's motion to compel discovery responses, Dkt. No. 278, by 11:00 a.m. on June 16. The brief may not exceed five pages. Cisco must explain why I should not follow the approach of (former) Magistrate Judge Paul Grewal in granting an earlier Arista motion to compel in this case. Dkt. No. 83. No reply will be permitted without leave of court. IT
Summary: ORDER ADVANCING BRIEFING ON ARISTA'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY Re: Dkt. No. 278 NATHANAEL M. COUSINS , Magistrate Judge . Cisco must respond to Arista's motion to compel discovery responses, Dkt. No. 278, by 11:00 a.m. on June 16. The brief may not exceed five pages. Cisco must explain why I should not follow the approach of (former) Magistrate Judge Paul Grewal in granting an earlier Arista motion to compel in this case. Dkt. No. 83. No reply will be permitted without leave of court. IT ..
More
ORDER ADVANCING BRIEFING ON ARISTA'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
Re: Dkt. No. 278
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, Magistrate Judge.
Cisco must respond to Arista's motion to compel discovery responses, Dkt. No. 278, by 11:00 a.m. on June 16. The brief may not exceed five pages. Cisco must explain why I should not follow the approach of (former) Magistrate Judge Paul Grewal in granting an earlier Arista motion to compel in this case. Dkt. No. 83. No reply will be permitted without leave of court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
