AVERY v. ELIA, 2:11-cv-3341 JAM CKD P. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20141028b28
Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 22, 2014
Summary: ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge. On October 7, 2014, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's September 17, 2014 order denying plaintiff's request that discovery be re-opened and that defendants be compelled to respond to certain discovery requests. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magi
Summary: ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge. On October 7, 2014, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's September 17, 2014 order denying plaintiff's request that discovery be re-opened and that defendants be compelled to respond to certain discovery requests. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magis..
More
ORDER
JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
On October 7, 2014, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's September 17, 2014 order denying plaintiff's request that discovery be re-opened and that defendants be compelled to respond to certain discovery requests. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed September 17, 2014, is affirmed.
Source: Leagle
