Guardia v. Affinia Default Services, LLC, CV 18-8965 DSF (GJSx). (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20181119705
Visitors: 12
Filed: Nov. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 15, 2018
Summary: Order DENYING Motion to Remand (Dkt. No. 14) DALE S. FISCHER , District Judge . Plaintiff has filed a motion to remand. The Court deems this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The hearing set for December 10, 2018 is removed from the Court's calendar. The motion is DENIED because the complaint states a federal question on its face. The declaratory relief claim requests a declaration that Defendants violated 12 C.F.R. 1024.41(f
Summary: Order DENYING Motion to Remand (Dkt. No. 14) DALE S. FISCHER , District Judge . Plaintiff has filed a motion to remand. The Court deems this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The hearing set for December 10, 2018 is removed from the Court's calendar. The motion is DENIED because the complaint states a federal question on its face. The declaratory relief claim requests a declaration that Defendants violated 12 C.F.R. 1024.41(f)..
More
Order DENYING Motion to Remand (Dkt. No. 14)
DALE S. FISCHER, District Judge.
Plaintiff has filed a motion to remand. The Court deems this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The hearing set for December 10, 2018 is removed from the Court's calendar.
The motion is DENIED because the complaint states a federal question on its face. The declaratory relief claim requests a declaration that Defendants violated 12 C.F.R. §1024.41(f)(1)(i). Compl. ¶¶ 47-49; Prayer for Relief ¶ 4. There may also be diversity jurisdiction, but that is not as clear and the Court need not reach the question.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
