BrightView Landscapes, LLC v. Stowell, 2:17-cv-08317 FMO (GJSx). (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20181030604
Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 23, 2018
Summary: ORDER RE: STIPULATION [57] DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE FERNANDO M. OLGUIN , District Judge . The Court, having reviewed the stipulation dismissing the entire action, including all claims and counterclaims, with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), entered into by and among Plaintiffs Bright View Landscapes, LLC and Bright View Landscape Services, Inc. and Defendant Martin L. Stowell, hereby ORDERS that all claims and counterclaims Plaintiffs and Def
Summary: ORDER RE: STIPULATION [57] DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE FERNANDO M. OLGUIN , District Judge . The Court, having reviewed the stipulation dismissing the entire action, including all claims and counterclaims, with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), entered into by and among Plaintiffs Bright View Landscapes, LLC and Bright View Landscape Services, Inc. and Defendant Martin L. Stowell, hereby ORDERS that all claims and counterclaims Plaintiffs and Defe..
More
ORDER RE: STIPULATION [57] DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
FERNANDO M. OLGUIN, District Judge.
The Court, having reviewed the stipulation dismissing the entire action, including all claims and counterclaims, with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), entered into by and among Plaintiffs Bright View Landscapes, LLC and Bright View Landscape Services, Inc. and Defendant Martin L. Stowell, hereby ORDERS that all claims and counterclaims Plaintiffs and Defendant asserted or could have asserted in the action against one another are DISMISSED with prejudice, with each party to pay its own costs and fees.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
