Cruz v. Chappuis, 2:18-cv-0193 KJM KJN P. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20191024936
Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 23, 2019
Summary: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . On August 26, 2019, the undersigned granted plaintiff 35 days to pay the $400 filing fee as required by the August 5, 2019 order. (ECF No. 58.) Thirty-five days from August 26, 2019 passed, and plaintiff did not pay the filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the p
Summary: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . On August 26, 2019, the undersigned granted plaintiff 35 days to pay the $400 filing fee as required by the August 5, 2019 order. (ECF No. 58.) Thirty-five days from August 26, 2019 passed, and plaintiff did not pay the filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the pr..
More
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
On August 26, 2019, the undersigned granted plaintiff 35 days to pay the $400 filing fee as required by the August 5, 2019 order. (ECF No. 58.) Thirty-five days from August 26, 2019 passed, and plaintiff did not pay the filing fee.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed.
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections.
The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
Source: Leagle
