BONGALIS-ROYER v. RJ WORLDWIDE, LLC, 4:14cv330. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20141112d65
Visitors: 31
Filed: Nov. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 10, 2014
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE RON CLARK, District Judge. Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. On September 29, 2014, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Defendant's Amended Counter
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE RON CLARK, District Judge. Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. On September 29, 2014, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Defendant's Amended Counterc..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
RON CLARK, District Judge.
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On September 29, 2014, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Defendant's Amended Counterclaims Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) [Doc. #18] be denied.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Defendant's Amended Counterclaims Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) [Doc. #18] is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
