Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hill v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 2:18-cv-01350-MMD-PAL. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181002m00 Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 28, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT MTC FINANCIAL INC. dba TRUSTEE CORPS'MOTION TO DISMISS AND JOINDER (SECOND REQUEST) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Plaintiff Michael Hill ("Plaintiff"), by and through his undersigned counsel of record, the law firm of Bowen Law Offices, and Defendant MTC Financial Inc. dba Trustee Corps ("Defendant"), by and through its undersigned counsel of record, the law firms of Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP and Kolesar &
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT MTC FINANCIAL INC. dba TRUSTEE CORPS'MOTION TO DISMISS AND JOINDER

(SECOND REQUEST)

Plaintiff Michael Hill ("Plaintiff"), by and through his undersigned counsel of record, the law firm of Bowen Law Offices, and Defendant MTC Financial Inc. dba Trustee Corps ("Defendant"), by and through its undersigned counsel of record, the law firms of Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP and Kolesar & Leatham, hereby stipulate and request an order from the Court to extend the filing deadline for Defendant's reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss and Joinder ("Motion to Dismiss") filed on August 20, 2018 (ECF No. 14). This is the second stipulation for an extension of time for Defendant to file its reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss.

Currently, Defendant's reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss is due no later than October 3, 2018. Plaintiff and Defendant request a fourteen (14) day extension of time, up to and including, October 17, 2018, for Defendant to file its reply. Defendant requires additional time to complete its research to support its reply, in drafting its reply, and time for client review.

IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff and Defendant that Defendant shall have up to and including October 17, 2018, to file its reply in support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 14).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer