Filed: Aug. 03, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 03, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: Defendants JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, TIM GUINASSO and JEANNETTE SANTOS (collectively referred to as "Judicial Defendants"), ALLIANCE ONE RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT, INC. (erroneously sued herein as "ALLIANCE ONE"), and STAT
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: Defendants JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, TIM GUINASSO and JEANNETTE SANTOS (collectively referred to as "Judicial Defendants"), ALLIANCE ONE RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT, INC. (erroneously sued herein as "ALLIANCE ONE"), and STATE..
More
STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:
Defendants JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, TIM GUINASSO and JEANNETTE SANTOS (collectively referred to as "Judicial Defendants"), ALLIANCE ONE RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT, INC. (erroneously sued herein as "ALLIANCE ONE"), and STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES ("DMV") and JEAN SHIOMOTO, Director of the DMV (collectively referred to as "DMV defendants") (all defendants collectively referred to as "Defendants") and Plaintiff Kathleen Marchetti (collectively referred to as the "Parties"), by and through their counsel, hereby submit this stipulation in support of their joint request that this Court permit the Defendants to file and serve their replies in support of their respective Motions to Dismiss up to and including August 8, 2016.
DMV defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint on July 11, 2016. Judicial Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint on July 13, 2016. Defendant Alliance One Receivables Management, Inc. filed its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint on July 18, 2016.
On August 1, 2016, Plaintiff filed a single omnibus opposition to the Defendants' three separate motions to dismiss (the "Opposition").
Without waiving any arguments regarding the timeliness of Plaintiff's Opposition, the Parties agree and stipulate that the Defendants may file reply briefs in support of their Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint up to and including August 8, 2016.
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE REPLY BRIEFS IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTIONS TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Pursuant to the stipulation between the parties, it is hereby ordered that the Defendants in this action may file reply briefs in support of their Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint up to and including August 8, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
