Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DOURANDISH v. FITZGERALD, C 13-5984 JST. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140403805 Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 02, 2014
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER AND STIPULATION ON CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTENSION OF TIME ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE JON S. TIGAR, District Judge. Federal Defendants Patrick Fitzgerald, Director of the Defense Contract Audit Agency and Chuck Hagel, Secretary of the Department of Defense ("Federal Defendants"), and Plaintiff Robert Dourandish ("Plaintiff") hereby stipulate as follows: A Case Management Conference ("CMC") is currently scheduled for April 16, 2014, with CMC statements due
More

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND STIPULATION ON CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTENSION OF TIME ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE

JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.

Federal Defendants Patrick Fitzgerald, Director of the Defense Contract Audit Agency and Chuck Hagel, Secretary of the Department of Defense ("Federal Defendants"), and Plaintiff Robert Dourandish ("Plaintiff") hereby stipulate as follows:

A Case Management Conference ("CMC") is currently scheduled for April 16, 2014, with CMC statements due April 2, 2014.

The Federal Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Complaint on March 28, 2014. Dkt Nos. 15-21.

The parties agree that to conserve the resources of the parties and the Court, it makes sense to continue the CMC and related CMC statement due date until after the Court rules on the pending motion to dismiss. That ruling will impact the parameters of the case and thus, the contents of the CMC statement and matters to be discussed at the CMC.

Plaintiff also requests an extension of time to prepare an Opposition to the motion, to which Defendants generally agree. However, the date that Plaintiff requests is at a time that Defendant's counsel is out on leave and the matter will need to be reassigned to another AUSA. Accordingly, the parties request an extension of time on the briefing schedule as follows:

April 30, 2014 — last day for Plaintiff to file an Opposition to the motion to dismiss. May 30, 2014 — last day for Federal Defendants to file a Reply. June 19, 2014 at 2:00 p.m: hearing on the pending motion to dismiss.

SO STIPULATED

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

The April 2, 2014 due date to file CMC statements and the April 16, 2014 CMC are hereby taken off calendar and are continued to a date to be determined after the Court rules on the pending motion to dismiss. The briefing schedule on the pending motion to dismiss is changed as follows:

April 30, 2014 — last day for Plaintiff to file an Opposition to the motion to dismiss. May 30, 2014 — last day for Federal Defendants to file a Reply. June 19, 2014 at 2:00 p.m: hearing on the pending motion to dismiss.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer