CENTEX HOMES v. NAVIGATORS SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, 2:16-cv-01958-JAD-VCF. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20170224i10
Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 23, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY'S MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF 65) [FIRST REQUEST] JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Plaintiff Centex Homes ("Centex") and defendant Lexington Insurance Company ("Lexington"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for Centex to file a responsive pleading, and for Lexington to file a reply brief to Lexington's motion to dismiss (ECF 65). The parties request the stipul
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY'S MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF 65) [FIRST REQUEST] JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Plaintiff Centex Homes ("Centex") and defendant Lexington Insurance Company ("Lexington"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for Centex to file a responsive pleading, and for Lexington to file a reply brief to Lexington's motion to dismiss (ECF 65). The parties request the stipula..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY'S MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF 65)
[FIRST REQUEST]
JENNIFER A. DORSEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Centex Homes ("Centex") and defendant Lexington Insurance Company ("Lexington"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for Centex to file a responsive pleading, and for Lexington to file a reply brief to Lexington's motion to dismiss (ECF 65). The parties request the stipulation because the travel schedules of the drafting and reviewing attorneys conflict with the current deadlines and do not allow the parties' attorneys adequate time to prepare the briefs.
Centex and Lexington hereby stipulate and agree that Centex's time to respond to Lexington's motion to dismiss shall be extended by 7 days, from February 24, 2017 to March 3, 2017. Additionally, the parties hereby stipulate that Lexington's reply brief shall be due on March 14, 2017.
This is the first stipulation for the extension by both parties to respond and reply to Lexington's motion to dismiss.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
