WOODARD v. TIPPETT, 15-07452 RGK (KSx). (2016)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20161026806
Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 09, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 09, 2016
Summary: [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT R. GARY KLAUSNER , District Judge . JUDGMENT After consideration of the papers in support of and in opposition to Defendant California Highway Patrol Officer Michael Tippett's Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, for Summary Adjudication of Claims filed by Defendant California Highway Patrol Officer Michael Tippett, and the oral argument of counsel, this court finds that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and that the moving party is e
Summary: [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT R. GARY KLAUSNER , District Judge . JUDGMENT After consideration of the papers in support of and in opposition to Defendant California Highway Patrol Officer Michael Tippett's Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, for Summary Adjudication of Claims filed by Defendant California Highway Patrol Officer Michael Tippett, and the oral argument of counsel, this court finds that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and that the moving party is en..
More
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
R. GARY KLAUSNER, District Judge.
JUDGMENT
After consideration of the papers in support of and in opposition to Defendant California Highway Patrol Officer Michael Tippett's Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, for Summary Adjudication of Claims filed by Defendant California Highway Patrol Officer Michael Tippett, and the oral argument of counsel, this court finds that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
Therefore, the Court orders Summary Judgment in favor of Defendant California Highway Patrol Officer Michael Tippett on all claims asserted in the Complaint in this matter.
Plaintiff's Complaint shall be dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
